Internal Continuity
Assess whether returning signals are consistent with the expected internal path through a suitable solid bar.
Gold Authentication Method
Non-Destructive Internal Examination of Suitable Bullion
Ultrasonic testing introduces sound waves into a suitable solid bar and analyses returning signals for information about internal continuity.
It is an authentication and internal-integrity examination—not an assay for exact gold fineness.
Bilex confirms whether the item geometry, surface and available reference conditions make ultrasonic examination appropriate.

An ultrasonic probe sends sound into a suitable solid item and receives reflected signals. Reflections may indicate the far surface, internal boundaries, discontinuities, voids or foreign inclusions that affect sound propagation.
The method preserves the bar and can add evidence about internal structure that a surface-composition measurement cannot provide. It should be interpreted alongside the item geometry, casting characteristics, calibration and other relevant examination results.
Ultrasonic examination does not determine exact gold fineness. An apparently consistent response does not by itself establish the analytical gold content of a bar, and the method must not be promoted as a guarantee against every counterfeit construction.
Applications
Assess whether returning signals are consistent with the expected internal path through a suitable solid bar.
Identify reflections that may be associated with boundaries, voids or inclusions requiring review.
Examine suitable cast bullion where geometry and surface condition support ultrasonic coupling.
Combine internal-structure information with surface, physical or analytical evidence as appropriate.
Suitable material
Before testing
Process
Record the bar or solid item and the internal-integrity question to be examined.
Assess geometry, surfaces and reference conditions before confirming the test.
Use appropriate equipment and calibration for the agreed scan approach.
Introduce sound and record returning signals from the selected examination areas.
Review the responses with stated limitations and recommend complementary testing where justified.
What it contributes
Scope
Method selection
XRF examines elemental composition in selected surface regions. Ultrasound examines how sound travels through the internal structure of a suitable solid bar.
They provide different evidence and may be complementary, but neither alone establishes representative bulk fineness of a thick bar.
Ultrasound preserves the item and examines internal integrity. Fire Assay determines gold from an appropriate representative analytical portion and consumes that portion.
If exact fineness is the question, ultrasonic consistency should not be substituted for an appropriate analytical determination.
Questions
No. It provides internal structural information and does not determine exact gold fineness.
Reflections can indicate internal boundaries, voids or foreign inclusions, but interpretation depends on equipment, calibration, geometry and legitimate casting features.
The examination is normally non-destructive for a suitable item and does not require removing an analytical portion.
No. Ultrasound examines internal structure; Fire Assay determines gold in a representative prepared analytical portion.
XRF adds surface elemental information while ultrasound adds internal structural evidence. Together they answer more than either examination alone, but they do not automatically establish bulk fineness.
Related services
Discuss the sample
Tell us the material, available sample quantity and the information the result needs to establish.
The final method and sample requirements are confirmed after the material and testing objective have been reviewed.